Pacifism vs neutrality: Buzzi's no to the UDC (cross-border guide)

Matteo Buzzi, a Verdi MP, criticises the UDC initiative on armed neutrality. It proposes nonviolent civil defense instead of rearmament.
Context
In a nutshell
-Member Verdi Buzzi criticizes UDC initiative on armed neutrality in the Constitution
- Proposes unarmed civil defense instead of military rearmament
- Calls for a NO vote on the federal initiative
Key facts
- Who: Matteo Buzzi, Verdi MP, Gran Consiglio, Locarno
- What: Critical UDC initiative on armed neutrality in the Constitution (paragraph 1)
- Historical: Initiatives "For a Switzerland without an army" in 1989 and 2001
- Proposal: Non-armed and non-violent civil defence, international cooperation
- Territory: Swiss Federal Initiative, national impact
Matteo Buzzi, deputy of the Greens in the Grand Council in Locarno, accuses the Democratic Union of the Centre of betraying Swiss pacifism. The UDC initiative introduces the concept of 'armed neutrality' in paragraph 1 of the Constitution. A choice, according to Buzzi, that goes in the opposite direction from the traditional pacifism that has characterized the Swiss movement for decades.
True pacifism is not defended with weapons. For decades, the Swiss peace movement has pursued a clear idea: a Switzerland without an army, capable of building its security on cooperation, international law, solidarity between peoples and non-violent civil defence. Those who voted for the "For a Switzerland without an army" initiatives in 1989 and 2001 did so precisely for this reason — not rifles, missiles, cannons and combat aircraft, but disarmament, diplomacy and non-violent instruments.
The initiative
Operational details
A radically different model emerges from Buzzi's proposal: a non-armed and non-violent civil defense. It is not a new vision. In Italy, it has been discussed for some time, from the insights of Aldo Capitini and Alexander Langer to the 'Civil Peace Corps' and proposals for a Non-Armed and Non-Violent Civil Defense, oriented towards preventing conflicts and protecting populations without resorting to weapons.
Recommended tools
For an updated estimate, use the net salary calculator and the CHF-EUR exchange comparator.
Key points
The choice between armed neutrality and pacifist neutrality is not abstract. It directly impacts the allocation of public funds, Swiss foreign policy and Switzerland's position in the global international context.
What armed neutrality would mean
If the UDC initiative were to pass, the Constitution would crystallize the concept of armed neutrality as a fundamental principle of the State. This would not mean an immediate change in spending, but establishes an ideological anchor that would further foster a spiral of rearmament. Buzzi points out that the UDC is already the main supporter of the ongoing rearmament, which absorbs huge financial resources. These resources could instead be invested in diplomacy, international cooperation and solidarity programmes towards countries in conflict, reducing Switzerland's vulnerability to geopolitical pressures.
The civil defense model
The pacifist alternative is not the absence of defence, but 'different defence': defence through civil and non-violent means. Buzzi cites the model of Unarmed and Nonviolent Civil Defense, which has been debated for decades in Italy and internationally. This model does not mean completely abolishing security institutions, but redirecting them towards civilian functions, protection of the population and conflict prevention. Specifically, it entails:
- Investing in diplomacy and international mediation
- Enhance cooperation
Discover Ticino job offers updated daily: 4,000+ positions from Swiss companies hiring cross-border workers.
Source: tio.ch
Frequently Asked Questions
- What does the UDC initiative on neutrality introduce in detail?
- The initiative introduces the concept of 'armed neutrality' in paragraph 1 of the Swiss Constitution. According to Buzzi, it does not propose cuts to the army, but rather strengthens the military apparatus at the constitutional level. It says nothing about reducing the army, investing in diplomacy, or nonviolent defense, making neutrality dependent on military force.
- What is the difference between armed neutrality and pacifist neutrality according to Buzzi?
- Armed neutrality accumulates weapons and armaments, accepting the logic of military deterrence. Pacifist neutrality rejects the weapon as an instrument of defense, choosing diplomacy, sanctions, boycott and international cooperation. Buzzi defines the UDC proposal as a 'warmongering neutrality' that prepares for war without questioning military spending.
- What historical Swiss movements opposed the army?
- The Swiss peace movement presented initiatives «For a Switzerland without an army» in 1989 and 2001, proposing security based on cooperation, international law, solidarity between peoples and non-violent civil defence. Buzzi subscribes to this tradition, stating that true pacifism has historically rejected armed deterrence.
- What does' unarmed and non-violent civil defence 'mean according to Buzzi's proposal?
- It is an alternative model, debated for some time in Italy and internationally. It means redirecting security institutions towards civilian functions, protection of the population and conflict prevention. It involves investments in diplomacy, international cooperation, civil protection capabilities, and strategic use of sanctions and nonviolent boycotts.
- Why does Buzzi criticize absolute neutrality when faced with aggression?
- According to the deputy, not taking a stand in the face of aggression is silent complicity. Buzzi cites the genocide in Gaza and ethnic cleansing in the West Bank as examples where true international solidarity cannot consist in indifference, but in recognition of crimes and explicit solidarity with victims.
Related articles
- All articles: Agreements and politics
- Verdi chiedono Segreteria Stato per clima
- Svizzera: sì alla neutralità e all'indipendenza
- Assemblee UDC e Verdi, si discute dell'iniziativa sulla neutralità
- Emergenza climatica: il dibattito sul Piano energetico ticinese
- Neutralità in Costituzione: il 27 settembre si vota