Ticino Parliament: A2-A13 to become a USTRA priority again

Context

TL;DR

• The Ticino Parliament supports the resolution on A2-A13.
• No votes against; seven abstentions from the Greens and MPS.
• The proposed postponement would go beyond 2050, perhaps to 2055.
• The Government considers the Trasporti '45 programme insufficient.

Key facts

• Body → Ticino Parliament
• Subject → A2-A13 motorway link
• Request → return to USTRA's priority projects
• Vote → no votes against and seven abstentions
• Region → Locarnese
• Time frame → beyond 2050, perhaps not before 2055
• Federal programme → Trasporti '45
• Government position → step in the right direction, but insufficient

On Tuesday, the Ticino Parliament supported, almost unanimously, a resolution addressed to the Federal Council. The request is precise: the A2-A13 motorway link must not be postponed further and must return to USTRA's priority projects, USTRA being the Federal Roads Office.

In a hypothetical scenario, a cross-border commuter whose destination is in the Locarnese would be faced with a planning decision concerning direct access to the motorway. The resolution, however, does not describe a new opening: it records the political request concerning the future of the link. calcolatore fiscale remains outside this account: the issue here is infrastructure priority, not the individual's situation.

The vote met with no opposition. There were no votes against, while the seven abstentions came from the Greens and MPS. It was recalled in the chamber that the Locarnese remains the only major Swiss region without direct motorway access. This is the territorial factor that supported the request not to postpone the project again.

The position of the Ticino Government

The concern expressed in the chamber stems from the Confederation's plan to postpone construction of the link beyond 2050, perhaps not before 2055. Speaking on behalf of the Government, State Councillor Raffaele De Rosa said: «This is a postponement that cannot be proposed».

In recent days, the Ticino Government had stated its position on the Confederation's Trasporti '45 programme. The assessment given was that it was a step in the right direction, but insufficient to meet the Canton’s needs. The same statement expressed concern about the postponement of the Bellinzona-Locarno link.

The resolution thus brings the issue to the federal level. The Ticino Parliament is asking the Federal Council not to postpone A2-A13 any further and to return it to USTRA's priorities. The source links this request to the Locarnese's lack of direct access and the Government's opposition to a postponement beyond the stated horizon.

Operational details

The issue for those traveling through the Locarnese

For cross-border commuters, the news conveys a practical distinction: the debate concerns the planning of a connection, not an immediate change to the route. For anyone who, in a hypothetical scenario, has the Locarnese as their destination, the discernible point is the uncertainty of the timeframe, not a new timetable, a new construction site or an alternative road indicated by the source.

The useful comparison is between the objective expressed by Parliament and the scenario challenged in the chamber. On the one hand, A2-A13 should avoid further delays and return to USTRA's priority projects. On the other, construction has been placed in a timeframe beyond 2050, perhaps no earlier than 2055. The two perspectives do not produce the same timeframe for a region that Parliament defines as Switzerland's only large region without direct access to the motorway.

Politics is not yet a timetable

The resolution is not equivalent to the construction of the project. It is a request addressed to the Federal Council and, at the same time, a political signal about the project's place among USTRA's priorities. For this reason, no opening date can be inferred from the vote: the available text does not indicate one. Nor is the Trasporti '45 program presented by the Ticino Government as a sufficient response to the Canton’s needs; the assessment is more nuanced, because the program is considered a step in the right direction but insufficient.

The reference to Bellinzona-Locarno adds the cantonal dimension to the discussion. The Ticino Government had expressed concern precisely about the postponement of that connection, while Parliament focused its resolution on A2-A13. For the cross-border commuter reader, this means distinguishing between the project’s name, the venue of the request and its possible future construction.

The simulatore busta paga belongs to another editorial path: the source does not address pay-related matters.

Recommended tools

For an updated estimate, use the net salary calculator and the CHF-EUR exchange comparator.

Key points

How to follow the dossier

The most appropriate course of action is to follow developments without attributing to the resolution effects that the source does not announce. A cross-border commuter in a similar situation could use a simple sequence, based solely on the steps reported: identify the project, distinguish the political request from its implementation, and verify the timeframe mentioned in the chamber.

1. Identify the project. The main reference is the A2-A13 connection; the Ticino Government's position also refers to the Bellinzona-Locarno connection. The two references should be kept as presented by the source, without adding technical details. 2. Read the request. The Ticino Parliament asks the Federal Council not to postpone the connection any further and to put it back among USTRA's priority projects. 3. Distinguish between what is hypothetical and what is certain. Beyond 2050, perhaps not before 2055, is the timeframe indicated by the Confederation as a hypothesis and challenged in the chamber; it is not a definite opening date. 4. Track the institutional follow-up. The point to verify in any updates is whether the request from Ticino is taken up at the federal level and whether the project is once again among USTRA's priorities.

What not to add to the news story

The text does not provide timetables, travel times, alternative routes, costs, construction sites or documents to submit. Nor does it indicate an administrative procedure for cross-border commuters. For this reason, a reliable update must remain anchored to the Ticino Parliament, the Federal Council, USTRA and the Ticino Government, the actors cited in the source.

This method avoids confusing a resolution with a project that has already been completed. The issue remains the one raised in the chamber: Locarnese is the only major Swiss region without direct motorway access, and the Government considers any further postponement unacceptable. To separate the infrastructure dossier from your personal calculations, use calcolatore stipendio.

Source: rsi.ch