Who proposed to limit the salaries of the managers of the sickness funds?

The proposal comes from the parliamentary initiative of the socialist Bapstiste Hurni, senator of Neuchâtel. The Health Commission of the National Council (CSSS-N) has developed the draft law, which proposes to anchor salary ceilings to the highest salaries paid within the Federal Administration, instead of equating federal councillors. The dossier is now ready for consideration in the plenum of the National Council.

What amount of salary does the CSSS-N dispute?

The Federal Council has proposed to target the salaries of sickness fund managers at around CHF 480,000 per year, equating them to the salary of a federal councillor. CSSS-N considers this figure excessive, since it proposes to adopt the parameter of the maximum salaries of the Federal Administration, which would result in a lower and more limited remuneration.

What is the difference between the Commission's position and that of the Federal Council?

The Health Commission (CSSS-N) wants to base the salary limits on the highest remunerations of the Federal Administration, considering the actual number of insured and the average costs of each fund. The Federal Council proposes to simply equate federal councillors, for administrative simplicity. The Commission considers that targeting Federal Counsellors would result in the system being overcompensated.

What is the point of disagreement on sanctions?

The Federal Council wants to introduce a criminal provision that would sanction violations of the new remuneration limits. The Health Commission, on the other hand, does not want any criminal provision in the draft law, preferring a different approach to compliance and monitoring.

When will this dossier be discussed in the National Council?

The dossier is ready to be examined in the plenum of the National Council, but the source does not specify a precise date for the session. The debate should take place soon. Once voted on in the National Council, the draft will go to the Council of States for examination and final vote.

Salaries manager sickness funds: no of the Commission (cross-border guide)

Di Redazione Frontaliere Ticino · Published on 21 August 2026

Bern, seat of Swiss federal politics and health commission decision-making

CSSS-N and the Federal Council divided on the remuneration of the heads of the coffers: CHF 480,000 per year is excessive. Commission prefers benchmark on federal administrative salaries.

Context

In a nutshell

CSSS-N Commission disputes Federal Council proposal on cash manager salaries
Disputed figure: about CHF 480,000 per year at the Federal Councillor level
Debate on benchmark: officials vs federal ministers
Dossier ready for vote in plenum National Council

Key facts

What: Debate on salary limitation top sickness funds mandatory sector
When: August 21, 2026
Where: Health Commission National Council (CSSS-N), Bern
Who: CSSS-N v Federal Council on manager remuneration
Amount: Approximately CHF 480,000 per year (executive proposal)
Origin: Bapstiste Hurni parliamentary initiative, Neuchâtel socialist senator

The conflict between the two bodies

A real arm wrestling with the remuneration of the heads of the sickness funds. The Health Commission of the National Council (CSSS-N) is clearly opposed to the Federal Council, which had proposed in recent days to guide the salaries of managers at the level of a federal councilor — about 480 thousand francs a year — to "simplify the system".

For CSSS-N that figure is too high. The project, the result of the parliamentary initiative of the socialist Bapstiste Hurni, senator of Neuchâtel, instead provides for anchoring the salary ceilings to the highest remunerations paid within the Federal Administration, taking into account the actual number of insured and the average costs per insured of the individual

Operational details

Implications for premium payers

When deciding on the maximum salary ceiling of the heads of the sickness funds, the impact is reflected — directly or indirectly — on the pockets of those who pay the premiums. An inflated remuneration of the managers represents a cost that is amortized on the basis of the policyholders. CSSS-N has understood this link well: limiting salaries to the levels of the Federal Administration (rather than the Federal Councillors) means containing the overall operating costs of the coffers. It is not just a matter of principle, but of economic rationality that directly affects the balance sheet of Swiss households.

The two visions in comparison

The CSSS-N proposes to anchor the ceilings to the highest salaries of the Federal Administration, with adjustment according to the number of policyholders and the average costs of each fund. This creates a flexible but contained parameter, calibrated on the actual operational size of each fund.

The Federal Council claims to simply equate about CHF 480,000 a year to the salaries of a federal councillor. Easier administratively, but potentially more onerous for the system.

The difference may seem abstract, but in a system such as Swiss compulsory insurance, where every franc of operating cost is transferred to premiums (directly or by redistribution), stricter management of remuneration has concrete consequences on

Useful tools to protect your net income

To reduce FX leakage, compare CHF-EUR exchange options and banks for cross-border workers.

Key points

Next legislative steps

The dossier is currently in the preparation phase for the plenary vote in the National Council. There are no precise dates yet for the session, but the debate will take place soon according to the CSSS-N. Once voted on in the National Council, the project (if approved) will move to the Council of States for review and a final vote. Those monitoring the issue can follow progress via the Federal Assembly portal (parlament.ch), where all documents regarding the parliamentary initiative by Baptiste Hurni and updates on its status are available.

How the plenary debate will be structured

If the Commission maintains its position during the plenary debate, the National Council will have to decide whether to adopt the CSSS-N's line (limits based on Federal Administration salaries with adjustments) or that of the Federal Council (equalization with Federal Councillors). The debate is likely to be heated, given that the two positions are sharply contrasted. In similar cases, a compromise is often sought that balances administrative simplicity (requested by the executive) with cost efficiency (requested by the Commission).

Possible scenarios for policyholders

If the CSSS-N prevails, remuneration limits for health insurance managers will be more contained, and consequently, there could be less pressure on premium increases in the medium term. However, the direct impact on individual premiums will depend on numerous other factors (risk of claims, medical inflation, general administrative costs).

If the Federal Council is correct and succeeds in achieving equalization with Federal Councillors, administrative simplicity will be guaranteed, but the costs of compensation for top management could be higher and potentially passed on to the community of policyholders.

…

Frequently Asked Questions

Who proposed to limit the salaries of the managers of the sickness funds?: The proposal comes from the parliamentary initiative of the socialist Bapstiste Hurni, senator of Neuchâtel. The Health Commission of the National Council (CSSS-N) has developed the draft law, which proposes to anchor salary ceilings to the highest salaries paid within the Federal Administration, instead of equating federal councillors. The dossier is now ready for consideration in the plenum of the National Council.
What amount of salary does the CSSS-N dispute?: The Federal Council has proposed to target the salaries of sickness fund managers at around CHF 480,000 per year, equating them to the salary of a federal councillor. CSSS-N considers this figure excessive, since it proposes to adopt the parameter of the maximum salaries of the Federal Administration, which would result in a lower and more limited remuneration.
What is the difference between the Commission's position and that of the Federal Council?: The Health Commission (CSSS-N) wants to base the salary limits on the highest remunerations of the Federal Administration, considering the actual number of insured and the average costs of each fund. The Federal Council proposes to simply equate federal councillors, for administrative simplicity. The Commission considers that targeting Federal Counsellors would result in the system being overcompensated.
What is the point of disagreement on sanctions?: The Federal Council wants to introduce a criminal provision that would sanction violations of the new remuneration limits. The Health Commission, on the other hand, does not want any criminal provision in the draft law, preferring a different approach to compliance and monitoring.
When will this dossier be discussed in the National Council?: The dossier is ready to be examined in the plenum of the National Council, but the source does not specify a precise date for the session. The debate should take place soon. Once voted on in the National Council, the draft will go to the Council of States for examination and final vote.