Crans-Montana: fired employee for building fakes (cross-border guide)

Context

In a nutshell

• The Municipality of Crans-Montana has dismissed an employee of the Technical Office.
• The measure follows the falsification of documents for a terrace.
• The employee was already involved in the investigation of the Constellation tragedy.

Key facts

• What: Immediate dismissal for falsification of building documents.
• When: 11 September 2026.
• Where: Municipality of Crans-Montana.
• Who: Employee of the Municipal Technical Office.
• Motivation: Identity theft and compromise of the relationship of trust.

On 11 September 2026, the Municipality of Crans-Montana formalised the dismissal with immediate effect of a collaborator in force at its Technical Office. The decision, officially communicated by the municipal councillor François Berclaz, comes at the end of a rapid internal investigation, initiated following the discovery of serious administrative irregularities related to the management of a construction application. Specifically, the investigation established the falsification of an official document relating to the terrace of the Constellation premises. The abuse involved the usurpation of the identity of a civil engineer, whose name was entered into the construction practice without his knowledge. The professional, heard by law enforcement, confirmed that he had never been involved in the project, learning of what happened only fortuitously in January through a journalistic report.

The dynamics of the facts

According to

Operational details

The dismissal of a public official for falsifying building documents represents a particularly serious case that goes beyond simple personnel management, touching upon the control mechanisms that Swiss municipalities exercise over construction permits. The practice of verifying the validity of professional qualifications, as required for authors of construction projects, is a fundamental pillar of built environment safety. When this filter is bypassed through identity theft, the entire cantonal and municipal supervisory system suffers a crack. It is worth remembering that in Switzerland, the procedure for building permits follows strict protocols defined by the individual cantons, but based on common principles of professional responsibility. The responsibility of the project author is not merely formal, but implies the assumption of legal and technical burdens in the event of defects or accidents.

…

Key points

The management of administrative procedures in Switzerland requires strict compliance with roles and responsibilities. For industry professionals and citizens interacting with municipal authorities, the Crans-Montana case offers a bitter lesson on the need for transparency. If an irregularity is suspected in a building procedure, it is essential to act promptly through official channels. The standard procedure allows for the consultation of publication files at the municipal technical offices during the public exhibition period of construction applications. If the improper use of one's name or a discrepancy between the filed project and reality is detected, a formal report must be submitted to the competent cantonal supervisory authority. It is never advisable to accept informal solutions or verbal agreements with officials suggesting circumventing current regulations, as the legal consequences, as demonstrated by the ongoing criminal investigation, can be severe and involve clients as well as technicians.

…