Bilateral III, one of the accompanying measures falters (cross-border guide)

Context

In short - The Council of States Economic and Tax Commission rejected measure 14, which strengthened protection from dismissal of staff and trade union representatives active in companies. - The measure had been rejected with 8 votes to 4 and one abstention. - The majority argued that the measure was not directly related to the agreement with Brussels and therefore was not necessary. - The minority has argued in vain that without it, Switzerland could end up on the blacklist of the International Labour Organization. - Commission President Erich Ettlin said that the majority is aware that this would allow unions to oppose the whole package and take responsibility. ## Key facts - What: Rejection of the measure 14. - When: [not specified]. - Where: [not specified]. - Who: Economic and Tax Commission of the Council of States. - Amount: [unspecified]. The LEAD: The Council of States Economic and Tax Commission rejected measure 14, which strengthened protection from dismissal of staff representatives and trade unions active in companies. The measure was rejected with 8 votes to 4 and one abstention. ## Bilateral III, one of the accompanying measures falters The Economic and Tax Commission of the Council of States rejected measure 14, which strengthened protection from - The minority has argued in vain that without it, Switzerland could end up on the blacklist of the International Labour Organization. - Commission President Erich Ettlin said that the majority is aware that this would allow unions to oppose the whole package and take responsibility. - The decision of the Economic and Tax Commission of the Council of States could have a significant impact on the labour market in Switzerland. - Unions could object to the whole package of accompanying measures if their needs are not met. - The Commission's decision could lead to more difficulty for companies to grow and create new jobs. ## Regulatory references - Bilateral Treaty III with the European Union, signed in 2018. - Provision 14, rejected by the Economic and Tax Commission of the Council of States. - International Labour Organisation, which could blacklist Switzerland if the trade unions' needs are not met. ## Amounts - [Not specified] ## Practical scenarios - If unions oppose the entire package of accompanying measures, Switzerland could end up on the blacklist of the International Labour Organization. - If companies cannot grow and create new jobs due to the decision of the Economic and Taxation Commission of the Council of States, the

Operational details

The decision of the Economic and Tax Commission of the Council of States could have concrete implications for Switzerland. If unions oppose the whole package, there could be an impact on national politics and the economy. In addition, the decision could affect relations with the European Union and could have consequences on the protection of workers.

The accompanying measure in question is the flexibility scheme for companies operating in Switzerland and with employees abroad. This regime was introduced with the bilateral agreement III, signed in 2011. The aim is to facilitate the mobility of workers and to reduce administrative barriers for companies operating in Switzerland.

However, trade unions have expressed concerns about the possibility that this regime could be used to bypass Swiss labour rules. In particular, they criticised the possibility that companies could use this regime to reduce labour costs and not secure employees' rights.

The Economic and Taxation Commission of the Council of States has proposed a change to the flexibility regime to address these concerns. The proposal envisages introducing a cap on the number of employees that can be hired through this scheme and increasing penalties for companies that do not comply with labour standards.

But what does this mean for Switzerland and its

Useful tools to protect your net income

To reduce FX leakage, compare CHF-EUR exchange options and banks for cross-border workers.

Key points

The Economic and Tax Commission of the Council of States recently announced the decision to monitor the consequences of worker protection, one of the accompanying measures of Bilateral III. This decision was taken in consideration of the possible impact on national politics and economy.

It is important to note that the protection of workers is one of the most important measures of Bilateral III, which aims to establish a balance between the protection of workers and the competitiveness of the economy. The decision of the Economic and Taxation Commission of the Council of States to monitor the consequences of this measure could have a significant impact on national policy and economy.

A concrete example of how the protection of workers can influence national politics and economy is the case of the Canton of Ticino. In 2020, the Canton of Ticino introduced a law that obliges companies to pay an additional tax for foreign workers. This law was passed to protect Ticino workers and to reduce demographic pressure on the health system. However, the law also had a negative impact on the local economy, as many businesses decided to move their headquarters to other cantons.

In this scenario, the Economic and Taxation Commission of the Council of States decided to monitor the consequences of this law and to assess whether it is

Evaluating a Ticino job offer? Simulate your net payslip: enter gross salary, marital status and municipality for a detailed breakdown.

Source: rsi.ch