Anti-G7 manifestation, the containment device was lawful (cross-border guide)

Anti-G7 demonstration in Geneva with police controlling the situation.

The cantonal Department of Institutions and Digital confirmed the legality of the containment device during the No G7 event in Geneva.

Context

In a nutshell

  • The temporary containment device was legal until its hermetic closure at 9.29 pm.
  • The No G7 demonstration of 14 June in Geneva saw serious breaches of public order.
  • The device has been established to limit the dispersal of violent individuals and collect evidence useful for investigations.

Key facts

  • What: Temporary containment device during the event No G7.
  • When: 14 June 2024, from 19:21 to 21:29.
  • Where: Geneva, Chateaubriand skatepark.
  • Who: Cantonal Department of Institutions and Digital (DIN).
  • Amount: 549 people detained.

The temporary containment device established after the No G7 event of 14 June in Geneva was deemed lawful by the cantonal Department of Institutions and Digital (DIN). The investigation, still ongoing, confirmed that the device was justified until its hermetic closure at 9.29 pm. The decision was taken after complaints from the organizers of the protest against the G7 summit held in Evian, on the French side of the Geneva, between 15 and 17 June.

According to the DIN, the device was prepared in a context of serious breaches of public order. After the first part of the demonstration had taken place peacefully, at 6.21 pm the situation degenerated with violence and damage. The person in charge of the intervention has therefore decided to dissolve the event.

At 19:21, the police

Operational details

Practical Implications

The DIN's decision to consider the temporary containment device lawful has significant implications for maintaining public order during demonstrations. This case underscores the importance of temporary measures to prevent serious harm to people or property in situations of violence and disorder.

The temporary containment device was established to limit the dispersal of violent individuals and to collect evidence useful for investigations. This type of measure can be adopted in the future in similar situations to ensure public safety and facilitate judicial investigations.

The No G7 coalition harshly criticized the police operation, describing it as "unqualified." However, the DIN clarified that the device did not constitute a deprivation of liberty but a necessary measure to restore public order. This case highlights the need for a balance between the right to demonstrate and the maintenance of public order.

In total, 549 people were detained during the police operation. This high number of detainees raises questions about the management of demonstrations and the need to ensure humane conditions during detention. The DIN will now examine the phase after 21:29 to determine if further measures were necessary.

Overall, 226 proceedings were opened following the anti-G7 demonstration. These proceedings concern the collection of biographical data, the order maintenance device, and its extension for the purposes of a judicial investigation. This case underscores the importance of rigorous procedures to ensure justice and transparency in investigations.

Key points

Actions to be taken

Following the decision of the DIN to consider the temporary containment device lawful during the anti-G7 event, it is important that the authorities and organizers of the events cooperate to ensure public safety and respect for the rights of demonstration. Here are some actions to take:

1. Accurate planning : The authorities must carefully plan demonstrations and negotiate with the organizers to ensure public safety and respect for demonstration rights.

2. Temporary measures: In situations of violence and disorder, authorities may take temporary measures to limit the dispersal of violent individuals and collect evidence useful to investigations.

3. Guarantee of human conditions: During the detention of persons, it is essential to guarantee human conditions and respect the rights of the detained persons.

4. Strict Procedures: Authorities must adopt strict procedures to ensure fairness and transparency in investigations.

5. Collaboration between authorities and organizers: Collaboration between authorities and organizers of events is essential to ensure public safety and respect for the rights of demonstration.

For more information and to calculate your net salary, see our calcolatore stipendio.

Source: tio.ch

Frequently Asked Questions
What was DIN's decision regarding the temporary containment device?
The DIN considered the temporary containment device lawful until its hermetic closure at 9.29 pm.
Why was the temporary containment device set up?
The device has been set up to limit the dispersal of violent individuals, carry out identity checks, stop people suspected of committing crimes and collect evidence useful for investigations.
How many people were detained during the police operation?
In total, 549 people were detained during the police operation.

Related articles