Zurich: redundancies after Finma proceedings (cross-border guide)

The Zurich group has dismissed more than a dozen employees following a procedure opened by Finma on some company life policies.

Context

In a nutshell

  • The Zurich group has laid off more than a dozen employees.
  • Finma has imposed a partial ban on the sale of certain policies.
  • The proceedings concern the Swiss life insurance division.
  • The products were offered at lower prices than agreed.

Key facts

  • What: Enforcement procedure and dismissals
  • When: News released by Bloomberg and SonntagsBlick
  • Where: Switzerland, corporate life insurance division
  • Who: Zurich Insurance Group and Finma
  • Amount: Annual profit of the sector concerned about CHF 20 million

The Zurich insurance group has recently implemented a series of redundancies, involving more than a dozen employees, following an enforcement procedure initiated by the Federal Financial Market Supervisory Authority (Finma). The news was confirmed by CEO Mario Greco in an interview with the international news agency Bloomberg. The Supervisory Authority has imposed a partial sales ban that specifically affects certain policies within the Swiss division dedicated to corporate life insurance and pension solutions. According to the proceedings, the core of the problem lies in the offer of insurance products at lower prices than originally agreed with Finma. Mario Greco acknowledged that, through the company's internal control mechanisms, this anomaly

Operational details

The implications of this procedure, although limited according to the top management of Zurich to the corporate life sector, highlight the growing attention of the authorities towards the sector of collective foundations. In the Swiss landscape, these foundations manage the assets of the second pillar for a large audience of workers. The public debate, also taken up by the Neue Zürcher Zeitung, often associates such events with the discussion of so-called 'rent theft'. This term is used by those who criticize the application of commissions deemed excessive by some operators or consultants who revolve around the world of pension funds. For a citizen or an employee who pays LPP/BVG contributions, the risk is to see their social security savings eroded due to non-transparent management costs or margins not in line with what is established by the supervisory authorities. The Zurich case therefore fits into a context where cost control and regulatory compliance are not only about the financial health of the company, but directly impact the stability of future pension benefits. For those working in Switzerland, it is critical to monitor how insurance companies manage second pillar funds. Finma's supervision is precisely aimed at ensuring that market conditions are fair and that the products offered do not suffer distortions that could ultimately damage

Useful planning tools

To estimate your pension strategy, use the pension planner and the pillar 3 simulator.

Key points

For employees and companies that need to manage their occupational pension scheme, it is essential to maintain a high level of attention to contractual documentation and the terms of service offered by their pension funds or life insurance providers. The Finma enforcement procedure reminds all market operators that compliance with agreed prices is a cornerstone of the stability of the financial system. For those wishing to deepen their understanding of their pension situation or assess the impact of management costs on their second pillar, there are analysis and comparison tools available. It is always advisable to request a clear and detailed statement of the fees applied to one's LPP/BVG position, verifying that these are in line with what was originally agreed upon by the employer. Those who want to verify their salary and pension situation or calculate the expected deductions can use the dedicated online services. Proper management of one's payslip is the first step to understanding how much is actually contributed to the Swiss pension system. In case of doubts about the correctness of corporate life insurance policies, the employer should be the first point of contact to clarify contractual conditions and request transparency from the involved insurance company. If the offered conditions do not seem in line with the market, alternatives can be considered or an review of the company pension plan can be requested, always taking into account current regulations and directives periodically issued by the supervisory authority. The stability of the pension system also depends on the ability of individual insured persons to monitor the quality of the services received. Remember that for any calculation related to your income and contributions, you can use the tools provided on our portal. Using the salary calculator allows you to have a clear view of mandatory deductions, including contributions to occupational pension schemes, helping to better monitor your financial situation over time. Maintaining an active and conscious management of your second pillar is a right and responsibility of every worker in Switzerland, essential for planning your pension future with confidence, ensuring that the resources accumulated are managed with maximum efficiency and transparency by the partner insurance companies.

Frequently Asked Questions
What did Finma impose on the Zurich group?
Finma has imposed a partial sale ban on some policies of the Swiss division dedicated to corporate life insurance and pension solutions. The measure arose from the discovery that these products were offered at prices lower than those previously agreed with the Authority itself.
What are the consequences for Zurich employees?
The insurance group has dismissed more than a dozen employees in connection with the proceedings initiated by Finma. CEO Mario Greco admitted that, through internal controls, the error should have been detected independently by the company before external intervention.
Has the activity of the division concerned been suspended?
The activity of the division was not totally interrupted, but the unit concerned was authorized to serve only existing customers. It has not yet been specified how long the enforcement procedure will last, during which the sales of certain products remain limited by the prohibition imposed.

Related articles