Vaud: yes to a 12% cut in taxes (cross-border guide)

Civic building in canton Vaud linked to the vote on a tax reduction

53.1% of voters in the canton of Vaud approve a 12% cut to income and wealth taxes; turnout at 50.0%.

Context

In brief

  • Vaud approves the 12% tax cut
  • The yes vote reaches 53,1% of the votes
  • Turnout at 50,0%
  • The 7% plan in 2027 will be cancelled

Key facts

  • Canton → Vaud
  • Outcome → 53,1% votes in favor
  • Measure → 12% reduction in cantonal taxes
  • Scope → income and wealth
  • Turnout → 50,0%
  • Existing plan → reduction of up to 7% in 2027

The vote and the positions at stake

The canton of Vaud has given the go-ahead to a massive tax reduction. With 53,1% of the votes, a legislative popular initiative calling for a 12% reduction in cantonal taxes on income and wealth was approved. Turnout stood at 50,0%. The news is attributed to Keystone-ATS.

The proposal stemmed from the initiative supporters' conviction that Vaud's tax burden is too heavy compared with that of other cantons. In their view, the canton can absorb the decline in revenue without affecting public services. They argue that the problem with public finances is not the trend in revenues, which continue to increase, but the level of expenditure, considered too high.

The institutional camp had supported the opposite position. The Grand Council and the Council of State had recommended rejecting the initiative, considering it excessive. The government had already introduced a purchasing-power plan that included, among other measures, a gradual reduction in income tax of up to 7% in 2027. According to the government's assessment, a 12% cut would have made significant savings and service reductions inevitable.

The left and the trade unions had also opposed it. In the debate, they called the initiative «a scam» and «the theft of the century», arguing that the benefit would have gone mainly to high incomes and large fortunes. Their objection also concerned the state's ability to continue financing public services.

The approval ultimately affects the plan already announced. The Council of State will cancel the 7% reduction provided for in the plan, so as to avoid a double tax cut. For an initial assessment of the possible effects on one's own budget, the relevant scope remains that indicated in the vote: cantonal taxes on income and wealth. One can start from calcolatore stipendio/imposte, keeping the two elements indicated by the source separate.

The result therefore combines a specific fiscal choice and a political debate over spending priorities. The electoral result confirms the approval of the initiative; the consequences for services remain described in the source as opposing assessments by the government and the proponents.

Operational details

The comparison between the two tax options

The most useful fact for understanding the practical impact of the vote is the comparison between the approved measure and the plan already in place. It is not a matter of adding two reductions. On the one hand, the initiative calls for 12% on cantonal taxes on income and wealth; on the other, the government's plan provided for a gradual reduction in income tax to 7% in 2027. The decision announced by the State Council cancels the second path to avoid a double cut.

ItemSource dataPractical reading
Initiative12% on income and wealthThis is the measure approved by the vote
Purchasing power planUp to 7% on income in 2027It will be cancelled by the State Council
Proponents' argumentRising revenues and excessively high expendituresThe decrease could be absorbed without cuts to services
Government's argument12% cutSavings and reductions in services would be inevitable

The point to verify in the budget

For a taxpayer, the concrete implication is not to automatically turn 12% into an equal amount for everyone. The percentage must be considered together with the two tax bases indicated, income and wealth. The useful comparison is between one's own tax situation and the two political hypotheses described, keeping the approved decision separate from assessments concerning the financing of public services.

The reference to the other Cantons should also be read for what it is: an argument by the initiative supporters about the supposed excessive burden of Vaud's tax system. The source does not propose a ranking or a numerical comparison. The certain fact is therefore the result of the vote and the scope of the reduction, while the debate remains open on the sustainability of public finances.

The distinction also serves to avoid confusing a tax choice with its effect on services. For the proponents, still-growing revenues and excessively high expenditures explain why the Canton can withstand the reduction. For the government, the left and the trade unions, the consequence would instead be a reduced capacity to finance services. Anyone preparing their own dichiarazione delle imposte can use these two positions as separate scenarios, without presenting as already realized what is still a political assessment in the source.

Useful tools to protect your net income

To reduce FX leakage, compare CHF-EUR exchange options and banks for cross-border workers.

Key points

How to track the impact on your own budget

To track the effect of the vote on your own budget, it is useful to use a simple worksheet based only on the available information.

Four checks before calculating

1. Identify the scope. The decision concerns the canton of Vaud and cantonal income and wealth taxes. Do not extend the 12% figure to items other than those indicated by the source. 2. Separate the two bases. Recording income and wealth as distinct elements prevents interpreting the reduction as a single undifferentiated amount. The percentage should not be converted into a figure that is the same for everyone. 3. Put the percentages in order. The 7% belongs to the purchasing power plan, which provides for a gradual reduction in income tax until 2027. The State Council will cancel that reduction after the initiative is approved, to avoid a double cut. 4. Note the two assessments. The proponents argue that rising revenues will make it possible to absorb the decrease without cutting public services. The government, on the other hand, considers significant savings and service reductions unavoidable.

This method helps prevent attributing a broader effect to the vote than the one described. The 50.0% turnout and the 53.1% yes vote explain the political outcome, but they do not replace the calculation of the individual tax position. Likewise, the comparison with the other Cantons remains the argument used by the initiative proponents to justify the proposal: the source adds no other figures or rankings.

The final check must therefore be made on the two fiscal elements mentioned and on the cancellation of the 7% reduction. To turn the available data into an orderly reading of your own budget, use calcolatore stipendio/imposte.

Source: swissinfo.ch

Frequently Asked Questions
What has the canton of Vaud approved?
With 53.1% of the votes, the canton of Vaud approved a popular legislative initiative calling for a 12% reduction in cantonal income and substance taxes. Participation was 50.0%. The result therefore concerns the cantonal taxation indicated in the source and does not contain an individual amount in francs for taxpayers.
Why were the Grand Council and the Council of State against it?
The Grand Council and the Council of State had recommended rejecting the initiative, deeming it excessive. The government had already introduced a plan for purchasing power, with a gradual reduction in income tax to 7% in 2027. According to the government, a 12% cut would have made major savings and reductions in services unavoidable.
What happens to the 7% reduction?
After the approval of the initiative, the State Council will cancel the 7% reduction already provided for in the purchasing power plan. The reason given by the source is to avoid a double tax cut. The plan provided for the gradual reduction of income tax until 2027; the new outcome of the vote therefore intervenes on the path already announced.
How did the initiators motivate yes?
The initiators argued that Vaud's taxation was too heavy compared to the other Cantons. In their view, the Canton could absorb the fall in revenues without cutting public services, because revenues continue to rise and the problem of public finances would instead depend on too high outflows. Their proposal therefore aimed to correct this imbalance, according to their reading.

Related articles