Border allowances: the EU reform that costs billions (cross-border guide)

Brussels reforms unemployment benefits: Switzerland risks up to CHF 1 billion more per year

Context

In a nutshell

  • The 27 EU countries have given the first green light to the reform of unemployment benefits for border workers
  • Today the States of domicile pay, in the future you will have to pay the last country of employment
  • Switzerland paid €226 million to France, €29 million to Germany, €21 million to Italy and €6 million to Austria
  • Estimated additional cost ranges from CHF 500 million to CHF 1 billion per year

Key facts

  • What: The EU's first green light to reform unemployment benefits for border workers
  • When: Decision taken on Wednesday in Brussels
  • Where: Meeting of the 27 governments of the Member States of the European Union
  • Who: EU countries, Switzerland, Joint Committee of bilateral
  • Amount: 226 million francs paid by Switzerland to France in 2023

The Brussels decision

Last Wednesday, the governments of the 27 member countries of the European Union gave the first green light to a reform that radically changes the rules of the game for unemployment benefits for frontier workers. At the centre of the discussion is a fundamental paradigm shift: if today the allowances are paid by the States of domicile of the worker, in the future it will be the last country in which the worker was employed to have to pay the benefits.

Switzerland is in a particularly exposed position. With over 400,000 border workers crossing borders every day to work in the Confederation, the country is traditionally among the favorites

Operational details

Practical implications for Switzerland

Estimated additional costs

The financial impact of the reform, if implemented, would be considerable. The estimated additional cost ranges from CHF 500 million to CHF 1 billion per year. This is a figure that, although not officially confirmed by the SECO (the State Secretariat for the Economy), represents an order of magnitude that cannot be ignored by the political decision-maker. For comparison, just think that the current system costs Switzerland about 282 million francs a year in total compensation to all neighbouring countries.

The Joint Committee mechanism

Today the Confederation has a sort of veto in the decision-making process. The Joint Committee may decide only unanimously and neither party may prevail over the other. This means that Switzerland could theoretically oppose the adoption of the new regulation. The source does not specify what the position of the Federal Council will be, but highlights that the issue is particularly sensitive from a political point of view.

The Context of Bilaterals III

The issue of benefits for unemployed frontier workers is part of a broader framework of negotiations between Switzerland and the European Union. The Federal Chambers are currently examining the new bilateral agreements, the so-called Bilateral III. The fundamental difference compared to the current treaties concerns the institutional rules for the resolution of

Useful planning tools

To estimate your pension strategy, use the pension planner and the pillar 3 simulator.

Key points

What could happen in the coming months

Possible scenarios for Switzerland

Switzerland is not required to adopt this regulation. This is the fundamental starting point for understanding the options available to Bern. However, the source highlights how the issue is politically sensitive for two main reasons. The first concerns the voting campaign on the initiative 'No to a Switzerland of 10 million!', which ultimately provides for the termination of the agreement with the EU on the free movement of persons. The reform of unemployment benefits risks becoming an argument used by both sides of the debate.

The second reason concerns the discussions on the new package of bilateral agreements, currently under review by the Federal Chambers. The reform could condition these negotiations, becoming an element of pressure or exchange during the discussion.

Step-by-step procedure: how the situation could evolve

1. Final EU approval (expected July): The 27 member states will need to definitively ratify the reform 2. Formal request to Bern: Once approved, the EU will ask Switzerland to adopt the new regulation 3. Examination in the Joint Committee: The request will be discussed in the joint body that manages the bilateral agreements 4. Swiss decision: The Confederation will have to decide whether to accept or reject the new rule 5. Possible retaliation: In case of refusal, penalized countries could activate pressure mechanisms

Frequently Asked Questions
What changes for border workers with the reform of unemployment benefits?
If a border worker loses their job, the allowances will be paid by the last country of employment (Switzerland) instead of the State of domicile. Switzerland currently pays a flat-rate allowance of 3-5 months; in the future it should pay the allowances for a longer period, estimated up to two years.
How much does the current system of benefits for unemployed frontier workers cost Switzerland?
In 2023, Switzerland paid 226 million francs to France, 29 to Germany, 21 to Italy and 6 to Austria, for a total of about 282 million. With the reform, the estimated additional cost ranges from CHF 500 million to CHF 1 billion per year.
Is Switzerland obliged to adopt the reform?
No, Switzerland is not required to transpose this regulation. However, the EU will likely seek adoption through the Joint Committee. Switzerland can object thanks to the right of veto (unanimous decisions), but a refusal could expose the country to measures of pressure or retaliation.
When will the reform come into effect?
Final approval is likely expected in July from the 27 EU countries. Subsequently, the EU will submit the application for adoption to Switzerland through the Joint Committee. The timing of any implementation has not yet been specified.
How does the dispute resolution mechanism work in Bilateral III?
Unlike the current system (where everything is decided politically in the Joint Committee), the new agreements provide for recourse to an arbitration tribunal that consults the European Court of Justice. In the event of an unfavourable ruling, the EU may adopt proportionate and circumscribed compensatory measures, not arbitrary retaliation in other areas.

Related articles